top of page

STREETS FOR PEOPLE

IMG_2706_edited.jpg

RETHINKING STREETS

Over the past half-century, public rights of way have not been very public. Instead, they largely function as cheap, inflexible infrastructure for private automobiles. Moving forward, traffic "optimization" through automation and navigation technologies may further alienate urban residents from their streets.

​

As humans, we want to make the most of our communities, including their streets. New technologies don't have to privilege transport flows. With the increased digitization of cities and the systemic and behavioral changes brought about by connected, automated vehicles (CAVs) and navigation and information technologies, we believe new systems of participation, street appropriation, and self-management can be established, affording communities greater access to and control over public rights of way. 

ABOUT
How can emerging technologies be leveraged to place communities in charge of this transformation?
FRAMEWORK

FRAMEWORK

Framework-10.png

In the future, public right of way management should integrate smart mobility technologies with context-sensitive street design methods to co-create public rights of way that are flexible and responsive to the diverse needs of communities. 

CASE STUDIES

CASE CITIES

Different cities are tackling smart mobility and context sensitive planning in different ways. These cities below have adopted distinct visions, policies and programs, and approaches to working with relevant stakeholders as it relates to each facet of the Streets for People conceptual framework. 

SEATTLE

PITTSBURGH

RESOURCES

PRESENTATION: TACTICAL URBANISM FOR THE SMART STREET

Presented at the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning 59th Annual Conference in 2019. 

PAPER: 
PUTTING COMMUNITIES AT THE CENTER OF CONNECTED, AUTOMATED MOBILITY

Research paper written for the 56th International Making Cities Livable Conference and its theme "A Healthy City for All." 

AUDIT:
BETTER INTEGRATING SMART MOBILITY + CONTEXT-SENSITIVE STREET  DESIGN IN
PLANNING

Report proposing audit tool for evaluating S4P.io principles in cities.

OP-ED:
TACTICAL URBANISM IN THE DIGITAL REALM

Op-ed written for the UVA Student Planner Association's magazine, SPINE.

ARCHIVE

CONTACT

Feedback

For any questions or comments, please fill out the following form:

Thanks for submitting!

Project Team

Andrew Mondschein, Principal Investigator

Assistant Professor, Urban and Environmental Planning,

UVA School of School of Architecture

Email: mondschein@virginia.edu

​

Research Assistants

Henry Cohen (hac6us@virginia.edu)

Laura Nagle (lmn6pu@virginia.edu)

Michael Salgueiro (ms5bv@virginia.edu)

CONTACT
bottom of page